An in-depth look at evolving copyright legislation, digital licensing trends, and what rights holders need to know heading into 2026.
The music rights landscape continues to evolve at a rapid pace. Streaming remains the dominant revenue driver globally, but the regulatory environment, licensing frameworks, and technology infrastructure that underpin rights management are shifting in meaningful ways.
This report examines the key trends shaping the industry in 2025 and what rights holders should be preparing for as they head into 2026.
Global recorded music revenue surpassed $30 billion in 2024, with streaming accounting for roughly 70% of that total. As revenue grows, so does the complexity of distributing it accurately. A single stream can trigger payments to dozens of rights holders across multiple territories, each governed by different agreements and collection mechanisms.
The sheer volume of data involved — billions of streams per day across hundreds of services — places enormous pressure on metadata accuracy. Even small errors in rights data can cascade into significant payment discrepancies over time.
The European Union's AI Act, which entered enforcement in stages through 2024 and 2025, has direct implications for the music industry. AI-generated content that uses copyrighted material for training must now comply with transparency and opt-out requirements.
Rights holders should audit their catalog for unauthorized AI training usage and ensure their metadata includes the machine-readable flags that platforms use to identify protected works.
The US Copyright Office has continued its modernization initiative, including plans for a unified digital registration system and improved interoperability with international databases. These changes aim to reduce the friction of registering and managing rights across jurisdictions.
Several territories have introduced or proposed reforms to how collecting societies operate. The push toward greater transparency, faster payment cycles, and cross-border data sharing is creating both challenges and opportunities for rights holders who depend on these organizations.
The industry is increasingly treating metadata not as an afterthought but as critical infrastructure. Standards bodies like DDEX have updated their messaging standards to accommodate new use cases, including user-generated content licensing and short-form video platforms.
Organizations that invest in clean, complete metadata today will be better positioned to capture revenue from emerging distribution channels.
The fragmentation of rights databases across labels, publishers, collecting societies, and distributors remains one of the industry's biggest inefficiencies. Initiatives aimed at improving interoperability — shared identifiers, standardized APIs, and linked data approaches — are gaining traction but remain a work in progress.
The concept of near-real-time rights resolution is moving from theoretical to practical. Several major distributors now support real-time ownership lookups at the point of ingestion, rejecting content with unresolved conflicts before it reaches streaming platforms.
Rights holders should prioritize three areas heading into the new year. First, ensure AI-related protections are in place for their catalog. Second, invest in metadata quality and adopt current DDEX standards. Third, evaluate their technology stack to ensure it can support the speed and complexity that the market now demands.
A comprehensive reference covering ISRC, ISWC, DDEX, and CWR standards — what they are, why they matter, and how to get them right.
Understand what a music conflict is and how rights disputes arise
Explore the layers of music rights — master, publishing, mechanical, performance, and more